In the past few years, Linux has become a serious contender as a business
operating system. This process has been accelerated by some high-profile
contract wins amon european city councils. Although the biggest of all, Munich, has stuttered
along, there have been too many to dismiss the arrival of Linux as a flash
in a pan. Even SCO's claims of copyright breach by Linux vendors, have not damaged the take-up of
the technology.
Microsoft has not been idle however. Faced by a serious challenge for the
first time since Apple decided that music was a more profitable enterprise
than computing, it has responded with gusto and has been determinedly
fighting its corner, producing reams of statistics to justify its premier
position in the market. The truth is, of course, that both operating systems
have their pros and cons. What has confused the situation is that both
technologies have their adherents, some of whom (on the Linux side
particularly) can be exceptionally vocal and, it should be said, excessively
partisan.
This report tries to separate myth from reality. We have examined all
aspects of running a business system. Subjects covered include web servers,
file and print services, networking and access technologies, application
software, storage and security.
In particular, we have looked at new
technological developments since the last survey. We offer no blanket
conclusion that Linux is better than Windows, or vice versa, but point out
the technological areas where one scores highly and the other less well. The
IT manager will be able to use this report to examine their own setups and
assess which operating system would be of most benefit. Please note: This is an independent report and there has been no financial contribution, or other involvement, from either Microsoft or any Linux Distributor.