08 May 2008
Three months after acknowledging multiple vulnerabilities in its popular Reader software and then patching the program, Adobe has finally provided some details about the bugs.

In a security bulletin, Adobe listed eight vulnerabilities - most of them critical - that it patched in early February when it released Reader 8.1.2 and Acrobat 8.1.2. At the time, Adobe had only said it fixed "a number of ... security vulnerabilities" in the two programs; it did not specify how many flaws were fixed, what they were or how attackers might exploit them.
Reader is one of the world's most popular pieces of software, since it's both free and the default PDF viewer for many users.
The secrecy three months ago puzzled security researchers, who noted that Adobe was usually more forthcoming about vulnerabilities. One researcher speculated about the mystery. "I think Adobe thought the severity of the vulnerabilities warranted some secrecy," said Andrew Storms, nCircle's director of security operations. "Six of the eight are in JavaScript. That's not a very difficult attack scenario. It's not as if you have to compile code. And it's going to work on any processor, and on almost any machine."
Even though Adobe disclosed some information about the bugs it fixed in February, the bulletin was still terse. It did not spell out possible attack vectors or even rate the bugs. "These vulnerabilities would cause the application to crash and could potentially allow an attacker to take control of the affected system," was about as far as the bulletin ventured.
Storms agreed that the three-month lag between patching the vulnerabilities and divulging some details was extreme, but noted that many of the flaws went back farther than February. "Some were apparently disclosed [to Adobe by researchers] in late 2007," he said. "There's one from November, and others from September and October."
Some information about the vulnerabilities had already been publicly reported by the researchers who uncovered them - VeriSign's iDefense, for instance, posted three bulletins in February - while others waited until this week.
Tuesday, for example, Fortinet posted a short security advisory about the JavaScript vulnerabilities it had reported to Adobe. Early on Wednesday, researcher Frank Ruder posted proof-of-concept exploit code for the Fortinet-found vulnerabilities to several security mailing lists, including Bugtraq and Full Disclosure.

Adobe did acknowledge in its security bulletin that there have been reports of in-the-wild exploits of at least one of the eight bugs, but the company stopped short of confirming the fact.
Several days after Adobe patched Reader and Acrobat, security researchers claimed that attackers had been exploiting JavaScript bugs in the programs using malicious PDF (Portable Document Format) files. One researcher said that the attacks had been occurring for several weeks, while another put the infections at "many thousands."
Those attacks, said Storms today, could still be effective, even though Reader and Acrobat have been patched. "We don't have statistics on how many people are still stuck on the Reader 7 code base," he said.
Reader 8.1.2 can be downloaded from the Adobe website or retrieved using the updater bundled with the program.
Follow highlights from Techworld on Twitter
Stay Informed > Subscribe to our Newsletters
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!
<<newer article | back to index | older article>>
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.
Click below to add 'Adobe comes clean on PDF bugs' to your blog.
If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.
If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.
Comments received
Just say no to Javascript said on Thursday, 08 May 2008
Why do people have to run Javascript within PDF's?