Juniper Networks is suing 10 unnamed defendants for libel. The action stems from comments posted to a networking news message board.
The vendor filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against individuals who posted several comments on Light Readings online news site. Among other things, the comments alleged that top Juniper executives were bribing attorneys to cover up a scandal at the company and installing spyware to monitor employees' work at home.
Juniper alleges the defendants made false statements that could hurt the company's business and reputation. It is seeking injunctive relief against the defendants to enjoin them from publishing defamatory statements, plus compensatory damages, legal fees and punitive and exemplary damages.
Two of the people who posted the comments - called "Doe 1" and Doe 2," used the aliases "infranet_rulz" and "exJuniper981," respectively, according to the complaint, to which Light Reading provided a web link. Aliases for the other defendants were not included in the complaint. Juniper said in the complaint it would amend the suit with the defendants' real names when it knows them. Juniper would not comment on the case on Wednesday, said Marina Tsatalis, an attorney with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati which filed the complaint on behalf of Juniper.
According to the complaint, Doe 1, "infranet_rules," wrote in one comment on 20 April 2005, in part, "the man at the helm seems to be paying (off) attorneys all over the bay area to cover up the scandal which resulted in the terminations of many at the top." In a comment on 21 April, the person wrote, "the man at the top should join his buddy Bernie [Ebers]..." A 22 July comment under the same name, on a story about Juniper's finances, said, "[t]heir lawfirm from Palo Alto and their security use spyware on employees' and ex-employees' home computers to log the activity."
Doe 2, who used the name "exJuniper981," commented on the same Juniper financial story and used the subject line, "This is a very unethical company." In the comment, the person wrote "[i]f they cannot fight something legally, [they] resort to attorney bribing and intimidation to coverup things."
Light Reading took the posts down from the website not long after they appeared, because they violated the site's message board policies, said Phil Harvey, Light Reading's news editor. The site's editors do their best to keep comments relevant to the topic and remove serious attacks on people, Harvey said. Though the messages don't appear on the site now, they have not been destroyed and could still be accessed within Light Reading's systems if needed as evidence, he wrote on the site.
Light Reading has a worldwide audience of more than 400,000 unique visitors per month, according to information on its website. Established in 2000, it covers primarily network infrastructure.
Find your next job with techworld jobs